Ugrás a fő tartalomra

Requirements 101: User Stories vs. Use Cases


Requirements 101: User Stories vs. Use Cases
Business Analyst
Here’s a question that I get over and over again:
What’s the difference between user stories and use cases?
— Ron K.
Before I dive into an answer to that question, let’s rewind a little bit and talk about where user stories came from. I like them because they’re a great example of how the Agile movement changed the software world. Programmers used to just dive right into software projects and start coding. Whenever one of those pesky users started to tell us what they needed, we’d stop them and say something like, “Don’t worry, I totally get it. I know what you need.” The Agile folks figured out that “I know what you need” is a nasty little trap that programmers — especially good ones — fall into. We’d spend the whole project thinking that we understood our users’ needs, only to deliver software that they didn’t want. The Agile folks realized that if developers had to start working with users throughout the project to understand their needs if they wanted to avoid the code-and-fix trap.
https://www.stellman-greene.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/aspm-cover.jpgJenny and I teach you all about use cases and requirements in our first book, Applied Software Project Management (O'Reilly, 2005).
And that’s why I think the user story is one of the most useful tools to come out of the Agile movement. A user story — some people call it a scenario — expresses one very specific need that a user has. It’s usually written out as a couple of sentences. Most user stories are written in the language of the users, so any user should be able to read a user story and immediately understand what it means. A lot of time, user stories are written on index cards, although I’ve put them in Word documents, Excel spreadsheets and Wiki pages (depending on how the particular project is run).
A use case is similar to a user story, because it also describes one specific interaction between the user and the software. When I’m training people to improve the way they write down their project’s requirements, I often describe the use case as a “deceptively simple tool” that helps us find and write down all of the ways users interact with the software.
Looking at those definitions, I can definitely see why there’s confusion about the difference between user stories and use cases. If you look at the last two paragraphs, it might sound like I said the same thing twice! But while user stories and use cases are definitely similar, there are important differences between them. Each serves a distinct purpose, and I think they both have their place on a well-run software project.
I think the easiest way to understand the difference between use cases and user stories is to take a look at an example. Luckily, I’ve got one that I think helps make the difference clearer.
In our first book, Applied Software Project Management, Jenny and I spend a lot of time talking about how to develop use cases and use them to build better software. And as an example, we showed a use case for a software feature that everyone should be familiar with: a search and replace feature from a word processor. Comparing a user story for search and replace with a use case for the same feature helps highlight the differences.
It’s not hard to find lots of user story examples. There are lots of different ways you’ll see a user story formatted (although if you’re looking for a user story template, a 3×5 index card should be a good starting point!). So what would a user story for search and replace look like? I took a stab at writing one:
search-and-replace-user-story-card
(One thing I like to do with user stories is to use “he” or “she”, rather than try to be gender-neutral. I think this makes the user in the story easier to connect with by personifying him a bit. It it also lets me write in a more conversational tone, which makes the user story friendlier and, I think, a bit easier to read and understand.)
Now, if you’re not familiar with user stories, you might think to yourself, “Wait a minute, my word processor’s search and replace feature does a lot more than that!” And that’s okay. A typical user story will have enough information to help the user understand what it is the software needs to accomplish, but it’s not meant to be a complete description of how the software works. I’m not going to try to give a long lesson in writing effective user stories here; I highly recommend reading Mike Cohn’s excellent articles and posts aboout user stories. (Mike, incidentally, is one of the software development veterans who contributed to our latest book, Beautiful Teams [O’Reilly, 2009]. He has some really fascinating things to say about Agile planning.)
So what would a use case sample look like for search and replace? Here’s the use case example Jenny and I built to demonstrate how use cases work:
Name
UC-8: Search and Replace
Summary
All occurrences of a search term are replaced with replacement text.
Rationale
While editing a document, many users find that there is text somewhere in the file being edited that needs to be replaced, but searching for it manually by looking through the entire document is time-consuming and ineffective. The search-and-replace function allows the user to find it automatically and replace it with specified text. Sometimes this term is repeated in many places and needs to be replaced. At other times, only the first occurrence should be replaced. The user may also wish to simply find the location of that text without replacing it.
Users
All users
Preconditions
A document is loaded and being edited.
Basic Course of Events
1.     The user indicates that the software is to perform a search-and-replace in the document.
2.     The software responds by requesting the search term and the replacement text.
3.     The user inputs the search term and replacement text and indicates that all occurrences are to be replaced.
4.     The software replaces all occurrences of the search term with the replacement text.
Alternative Paths
1.     In Step 3, the user indicates that only the first occurrence is to be replaced. In this case, the software finds the first occurrence of the search term in the document being edited and replaces it with the replacement text. The postcondition state is identical, except only the first occurrence is replaced, and the replacement text is highlighted.
2.     In Step 3, the user indicates that the software is only to search and not replace, and does not specify replacement text. In this case, the software highlights the first occurrence of the search term and the use case ends.
3.     The user may decide to abort the search-and-replace operation at any time during Steps 1, 2, or 3. In this case, the software returns to the precondition state.
Postconditions
All occurrences of the search term have been replaced with the replacement text.
Now, if I were a developer building a word processor or text editor, I’d actually be able to write a search and replace feature that implements that particular use case. (Just to be clear: there are many different use case formats; Jenny and I use this use case template in our book because it’s stripped down to the bare minimum sections that we think an effective use case should have.)
Here’s something about use cases that I think is interesting. While you were reading through our use case example, were you thinking of something that looks like the Replace dialog in Notepad or Microsoft Word, or the Find dialog in TextEdit? If so, take another look at the sample use case. It doesn’t have any words like “window,” “button,” “click,” “field” or “checkbox”. It’s all about what actions the user takes, and how the software responds. And there are many different ways that you could build software that implements the use case. Have you ever used the search and replace feature in vi? What about the search and replace feature in Emacs? They have very different user interfaces! Who knew there were so many ways you could implement search and replace? But if you compare each of them with this use case, they all follow the same basic course of events.
So now that we’ve gone through the use case and user story examples, what’s the difference between user stories and use cases? Here’s what I think are some of the key differences:
·         User stories are about needs. When you write a user story, what you’re describing is a “raw” user need. It’s something that the user needs to do in his day-to-day job. If you never build any software for him, then that need will still exist!
·         Use cases are about the behavior you’ll build into the software to meet those needs. A developer who needs to build working software should be able to read a use case and get a good sense of what the software needs to do. It typically has a lot of detail, and describes everything that the developer needs to build in order to meet the user’s need. That’s why it needs to have a lot more detail, and be clear and unambiguous.
·         User stories are easy for users to read. When you write a user story, what you’re concentrating on is writing something that anyone can understand, in the language of the users. We all know that developers have a lot more patience for talking about details of the software they’re building than users do, which is why user stories have to be brief. A user story needs to express a complete thought in just a couple of sentences. (That’s also why it’s good to put them on index cards: somehow, that makes it clearer that it’s self-contained and independent of the other user stories.)
·         Use cases describe a complete interaction between the software and users (and possibly other systems). When you’re doing use case analysis, what you’re doing is designing a functional solution that meets the users’ needs. It needs to be something that developers can implement. It’s possible that one user story could spawn several use cases. And when you combine all of your use cases into one use case document, you’ll end up with a complete description of every interaction between the user and the software that you’re planning on building. And if your software has to interact with multiple systems, you may end up treating those other systems as actors in your use case.
Once you get a sense of how user stories and use cases differ, you can start to see what purpose they can serve on your project. And if you only use user stories, or if you only use cases, then maybe on your next project you can try using them both.
Share this:
Post navigation
23 thoughts on “Requirements 101: User Stories vs. Use Cases”
3.      https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ce98206cafbd137079c111d48d691640?s=60&d=mm&r=gjcqualitystreet
in addition, here is list of the 14 differences I’ve noticed:
5.      Pingback: User Stories | Information Design
7.      Pingback: Blog
18.  Pingback: Confluence: Software
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Welcome!
·         Login to comment
·         Register
Our books
Head First Agile
http://akamaicovers.oreilly.com/images/0636920022374/cat.gif
Head First Agile is a highly visual brain-friendly guide to help you learn important agile concepts and ideas. It covers Scrum, XP, Lean, and Kanban, and it also helps you prepare for the PMI-ACP certification.
Learning Agile
Learning Agile
Learning Agile is a comprehensive guide to the most popular agile methods, written in a light and engaging style that makes it easy for you to learn. Read the first chapter for free!
Head First PMP
Head First PMP
Head First PMP gets you prepared for the Project Management Professional certification exam by helping you become a better project manager.
Head First C#
https://www.stellman-greene.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/head-first-c_-cover-small.png
Head First C# is one of the most popular books for learning C#. In our opnion it's the easiest and most fun way to do it, too!
Applied Software Project Management
Applied Software Project Management
Applied Software Project Management helps developers and project managers build better software by diagnosing and fixing the most common project problems.
Beautiful Teams
Beautiful Teams
Beautiful Teams: Inspiring and Cautionary Tales from Veteran Team Leaders is a collection of stories and interviews with veteran team leaders that takes you behind the scenes with some of the most interesting teams in software engineering history.
Open source projects we maintain


Megjegyzések

Népszerű bejegyzések ezen a blogon

SW Documentation: Requirements

Requirements Nonfunctional Requirements Q&A FEBRUARY 17, 2010  ~  ANDREW STELLMAN ~  3 COMMENTS Non-functional requirements Q&A: We answer questions from readers about using  nonfunctional requirements  on a real software project, and how to use them on a real software project. Non-functional requirements: Planning out how well your software will work A couple of months ago I wrote a post called  Using nonfunctional requirements to build better software . It’s basically a step-by-step guide for creating an easy, practical technique to use nonfunctional requirements on a real software project, treating them in a way that’s similar to how a lot of Agile teams treat user stories, scenarios and other functional requirements: by sticking them on index cards and using them to do some lightweight planning. Since then, I’ve gotten a lot of questions about nonfunctional requirements (or, as some people call them, non functional requirements...

Privacy Notice for Visitors to Our Users’ Sites

Privacy Notice for Visitors to Our Users’ Sites Sections Who’s Who and What This Privacy Notice Covers Information We Collect About Visitors to Our Users’ Sites Information a Visitor Provides to a Site Information We Automatically Collect from the Site Other Information Provided by Our Users How We Use Visitor Information How We Share Visitor Information Other Tools Other Resources Hi there! This Privacy Notice explains how we, at Automattic, process information about the visitors of our users’ websites in connection with the services we provide through WordPress.com, Jetpack (including WooCommerce Services), IntenseDebate, Polldaddy.com, and Akismet. Read on! Who’s Who and What This Privacy Notice Covers Let’s talk first about who we are at Automattic, what we do, and what this Privacy Notice covers. We are the folks behind a variety of products and services designed to allow anyone–from bloggers, to small business owners, and enterprises–to create, publ...

THE RIGHT WAY TO WRITE A SINGLETON

THE RIGHT WAY TO WRITE A SINGLETON July 17, 2015 by   Hector Matos Even though I've written about the woes of managing state in my previous post, sometimes there's just no way we can avoid it. One example of managing state is something we're all quite acquainted with - The Singleton. The problem we find in Swift is that there are SEVERAL ways of implementing them. But which way is the right way? In this post I'm going to show you the history of the singleton and then show you the right way to implement the singleton in Swift. If you want to see the right way to implement the singleton pattern in Swift along with proof of it's "right-ness", you can scroll to the bottom of the post and see it there. :) A TRIP DOWN MEMORY LANE Swift is a natural evolution of Objective-C. In Objective-C, this is how we implemented the singleton: @interface Kraken : NSObject @end @implementation Kraken + ( instancetype ) sharedInstance { ...